Literally Graphic wants to read They Shoot Horses, Don't They? by Horace McCoy

They Shoot Horses, Don't They? by Horace McCoy
They Shoot Horses, Don't They? is a novel written by Horace McCoy and first published in 1935. The story mainly …
An avid audiobook and comics reader with few IRL outlets for what has become a very special interest.
This link opens in a pop-up window
10% complete! Literally Graphic has read 10 of 100 books.
They Shoot Horses, Don't They? is a novel written by Horace McCoy and first published in 1935. The story mainly …
Hands in the dirt again. Doing something real. No people around. Yeah, that’s the dream.
— After atlas by Emma Newman (A Planetfall novel)
today's pick is the Constitution Illustrated by R Sikoryak. Published by Drawn & Quarterly in 2020.
Content note for american exceptionalism.
While I've been sort of intrigued by the concept behind Sioryak's work over the years, I finally decided to pick this particular title up because I felt like (given current events) ragging on the constitution a bit. Even if it took me several more weeks and many headlines to actually make the time to finish this mental dump. I will also be reviewing this volume, but if you can't take me not liking the american constitution I suggest you move along, although hate watching, down voting and leaving negative comments boosts me in the algorithm just as good as anything else I suppose. Do what you will.
Keywords that came to mind reading this very compact volume: Diversity washing, comics history, copy and paste.
The publisher's summary (minus a …
today's pick is the Constitution Illustrated by R Sikoryak. Published by Drawn & Quarterly in 2020.
Content note for american exceptionalism.
While I've been sort of intrigued by the concept behind Sioryak's work over the years, I finally decided to pick this particular title up because I felt like (given current events) ragging on the constitution a bit. Even if it took me several more weeks and many headlines to actually make the time to finish this mental dump. I will also be reviewing this volume, but if you can't take me not liking the american constitution I suggest you move along, although hate watching, down voting and leaving negative comments boosts me in the algorithm just as good as anything else I suppose. Do what you will.
Keywords that came to mind reading this very compact volume: Diversity washing, comics history, copy and paste.
The publisher's summary (minus a short bit about all his other works) is "[Sikoryak] employs his magic yet again to investigate the very framework of the country with Constitution Illustrated. By visually interpreting the complete text of the supreme law of the land with more than a century of American pop culture icons, Sikoryak distills the very essence of the government legalese from the abstract to the tangible, the historical to the contemporary.
Among Sikoryak’s spot-on unions of government articles and amendments with famous comic-book characters: the Eighteenth Amendment that instituted prohibition is articulated with Homer Simpson running from Chief Wiggum; the Fourteenth Amendment that solidifies citizenship to all people born and naturalized in the United States is personified by Ms. Marvel; and, of course, the Nineteenth Amendment offering women the right to vote is a glorious depiction of Wonder Woman breaking free from her chains. American artists from George Herriman (Krazy Kat) and Charles Schulz (Peanuts) to Raina Telgemeier (Sisters) and Alison Bechdel (Dykes to Watch Out For) are homaged, with their characters reimagined in historical costumes and situations.
We the People has never been more apt."
Before digging into what I thought of the writing and art I would like to highlight that I really really really am a huge fan of graphic nonfiction and its potential to help people understand complex topics more easily via visual language. And while the summary I just read tries to say that this volume does that well, I would like to argue that it is at most a very shallow rendering. Because nothing about this book made anything about the constitution of the so called united states of america any easier to understand, and I truly feel like it was actually more difficult to understand being broken up like it was between so many tiny pages that were mostly illustration.
Even trying to integrate the timeline of how the current constitution came together over the past 200+ years, instead of tucking it way back in the final pages, would have been mildly helpful.
As it is, Sikoryak thinks he's doing some sort of heavy lifting by juxtapositioning lines from the constitution and vaguely related comic book icons. Albeit skillfully rendered on a technical proficiency level.
Some pages felt particularly egregious when one is not a fan of Hamilton's style of diversity washing the so called founding fathers. Did you know that Toni Morrison hated the musical Hamilton and helped fund the production of a play entitled "The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda"? If not, I suggest you look into it.
Moving onto the constitution itself... Actually I don't know what to say. Because honestly, to the average person who I imagine watching this video who may not have realized that the constitution is not going to protect us. I don't really want to be rude to you and I am certainly not gloating.
As far as I know nothing in my star chart says anything about how perfectly they aligned in order to inoculate me from patriotism. But they somehow did. I've never been good at keeping a diary but I probably believed in some sort of american exceptionalism at some point, but that was a long time ago if at all. I honestly feel lucky, because it's certainly not something based on me being better or smarter then anyone else. But here we are. All cats are beautiful and all that jazz.
I'm going to make some statements now. Conclusions that I have come to over the years and you can agree with me or not. I don't have any receipts because I'm only now trying to collect them when I find myself learning new things. Thank you Obsidian. These ideas are certainly not unique to me, but I feel like saying them. I might let people disagree in the comments I might not. The youtube comments sections on my videos have never been a free speech zone that's for sure. Because I don't actually believe in free speech lol. But that's another video I've been meaning to make for years...
Anyway:
People who used to talk about going back to the original meaning of the founding fathers when it came to interpreting the constitution were almost never actually engaging in good faith. It was just words they could string together to sound smart, patriotic and get their way. I suspect that much is pretty obvious at this point.
The idea that the american constitution is the best is the stupidest idea on planet earth. So many constitutions have been created and amended since the american one. It is a ludicrous idea that none of them improved on the concept at all.
Point 2.5 would be if you've never engaged with any of those other constitutions, go check one out. You might learn something about a place other then so called america. most of which manage to survive without free speech don't ya know.
And with that, I guess I shall wrap up this very unusual review. Apologies to people watching this at some point close to its original publication as my posting is very sporadic. What can I say, there are many IRL things to be doing and never enough time in the day to do them all. But don't worry, the likelihood of my next video being more of the norm and nothing like whatever you call this mess is statistically very high.
Take care and remember all colonial settler states are a lie.
This final arc of the hit supernatural fantasy series pits two powerful witches against each other in an all out …
Matt Bors makes the bold declaration that We Should Improve Society Somewhat in this collection of comics from The Nib's …
Set one hundred years in our future, WE STAND ON GUARD follows a heroic band of Canadian civilians turned freedom …
This is a handbook for change. Because we all know ways in which life could be better. And it can …
A moving collection of six short stories that explores what must be stripped away to find the truth and celebrates …
The master of the visual mash-up returns with his signature idiosyncratic take on the Constitution
R. Sikoryak is the master …
"On loving women is a collection of stories about first love and sexual identity. Diane Obomsawin shares her friends' and …
Content notes for: nudity, sex, and one Blue is the Warmest Colour style short story featuring under age age gap fling with cheating.
What kinds of keywords came to mind? Lesbians, obviously, coming of age, slice of life, romance, and boarding schools.
"On Loving Women is a new collection of stories about coming out, first love, and sexual identity by the animator Diane Obomsawin. With this work, Obomsawin brings her gaze to bear on subjects closer to home—her friends' and lovers' personal accounts of realizing they're gay or first finding love with another woman. Each story is a master class in reaching the emotional truth of a situation with the simplest means possible. Her stripped-down pages use the bare minimum of linework to expressively reveal heartbreak, joy, irritation, and fear."
The art style was interesting, and fits with the genre, but it was not really my favourite.
Gender and sexuality …
Content notes for: nudity, sex, and one Blue is the Warmest Colour style short story featuring under age age gap fling with cheating.
What kinds of keywords came to mind? Lesbians, obviously, coming of age, slice of life, romance, and boarding schools.
"On Loving Women is a new collection of stories about coming out, first love, and sexual identity by the animator Diane Obomsawin. With this work, Obomsawin brings her gaze to bear on subjects closer to home—her friends' and lovers' personal accounts of realizing they're gay or first finding love with another woman. Each story is a master class in reaching the emotional truth of a situation with the simplest means possible. Her stripped-down pages use the bare minimum of linework to expressively reveal heartbreak, joy, irritation, and fear."
The art style was interesting, and fits with the genre, but it was not really my favourite.
Gender and sexuality were obviously pretty central to this collection of short stories. Apparently Obomsawin interviewed a number of people she knew across a wide age range, but since she chose to focus more on each person's first lesbian relationship all the stories feature fairly young protagonists. I was a bit concerned about the lack of trans representation, as I'm not sure if this was an oversight or a deliberate exclusion. An alibi fairly cursory searches via duck duck go did not appear to reveal anything, but Obomsawin does not appear to be a terribly online person either.
Similarly, racial diversity seemed to be largely ignored. But living in a still pretty segregated society, it's not hard to believe that since Obomsawin was drawing from her personal contacts there could just not be much diversity to draw on. That said, I'm not sure if the different animal heads Obomsawin uses was supposed to denote racial different? So there is a chance it just flew right over my head.
Class did feel like one of the things that did really differentiate some of the characters from each other.
And, again, might have missed something but the assumption seemed to be that everyone was pretty able bodied.
So yeah, to conclude, I am glad I finally got around to reading this book as it's been on my TBR for what feels like forever. That said, as I already mentioned, not a new favourite. I have been feeling very unnerved by my ratings of late though, always feeling like I'm rating things to highly or to lowly. So let us see... I think I'm going to follow my gut and start with a two out of five stars, which always feels harsh, but it was OK so there's that.
In a series of personal essays, prominent journalist and LGBTQIA+ activist George M. Johnson explores his childhood, adolescence, and college …
In a series of personal essays, prominent journalist and LGBTQIA+ activist George M. Johnson explores his childhood, adolescence, and college …